Joanne R. Graves v. Office of Personnel Management

826 F.2d 1072, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 419, 1987 WL 38013
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 1987
Docket87-3179
StatusUnpublished

This text of 826 F.2d 1072 (Joanne R. Graves v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joanne R. Graves v. Office of Personnel Management, 826 F.2d 1072, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 419, 1987 WL 38013 (Fed. Cir. 1987).

Opinion

826 F.2d 1072

Unpublished disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Joanne R. GRAVES, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

Appeal No. 87-3179

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 14, 1987.

Before DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and BENNETT and MILLER, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

DECISION

This appeal is dismissed because the decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board), upholding the reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) which had denied petitioner's application for disability retirement, are beyond this court's jurisdiction.

OPINION

The Board's administrative judge, in his initial decision, carefully reviewed the evidence as to petitioner's claimed medical disability and concluded that she had failed to establish her entitlement to discability retirement. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management (Lindahl I), 470 U.S. 768 (1985), determined that we cannot review the correctness of the factual determinations underlying that conclusion, and there are no allegations of procedural or other fundamental errors which might allow us to upset the MSPB's conclusion. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction. Lee v. Office of Personnel Management, 762 F.2d 987 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

If petitioner wishes to renew her application for disability retirement on the basis of new evidence not previously before the Board, she is free to do so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
470 U.S. 768 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Joseph M. Lee v. Office of Personnel Management
762 F.2d 987 (Federal Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 F.2d 1072, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 419, 1987 WL 38013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joanne-r-graves-v-office-of-personnel-management-cafc-1987.