Joann Martinez v. Winston Blake
This text of Joann Martinez v. Winston Blake (Joann Martinez v. Winston Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00490-CV
Joann MARTINEZ, Appellant
v.
Winston BLAKE, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CV01545 Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 11, 2023
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief was originally due by August 21, 2023. When neither the brief nor a
motion for extension of time was filed, we ordered appellant to file, by September 21, 2023, her
brief and a written response reasonably explaining her failure to timely file a brief and why
appellee is not significantly injured by her failure to timely file a brief. In our order, we cautioned
appellant if she failed to timely file a brief and written response by the date ordered, we would
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c). Appellant 04-23-00490-CV
did not respond to our order, and to date, she has not filed a brief. We therefore dismiss this appeal
for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(c).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joann Martinez v. Winston Blake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joann-martinez-v-winston-blake-texapp-2023.