Joann Carbone v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJanuary 2, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-05948
StatusUnknown

This text of Joann Carbone v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Joann Carbone v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joann Carbone v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, (C.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1! ROBERT S. GIANELLI #82116 JOSHUA S. DAVIS #193187 2 ALEXANDRA H. GIANELLI #324246 GIANELLI & MORRIS, A Law Corporation 3 550 South Hope Street, Suite 1645 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 489-1600; Fax: (213) 489-1611 rob.gianelli@gmlawyers.com 5 joshua.davis@gmlawyers.com 6 alex.gianelli@gmlawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 JOANN CARBONE 8 9 MICHAEL J. DUVALL (SBN 276994) DENTONS US LLP 10 601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, California 90017 Tel: (213) 623-9300 / Fax: (213) 623-9924 michael.duvall@dentons.com SANDRA D. HAUSER (admitted pro hac vice) DENTONS US LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas 14 New York, New York 10020 Tel: (212) 768-6700 / Fax: (212) 768-6800 sandra.hauser@dentons.com 16 Attorneys for Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and 17 | METROPOLITAN TOWER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 JOANN CARBONE 22 Case No. 2:23-CV-05948-AB-E Plaintiff, 23 Hon. Charles F. Eick Vv. 24 STIPULATED METROPOLITAN LIFE PROTECTIVE ORDER 25 INSURANCE COMPANY, METROPOLITAN TOWER LIFE 26 INSURANCE COMPANY Complaint Filed: July 21, 2023 27 Defendants. 28 2:23-CV-05948-AB-E STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 Subject to the approval of this Court, Plaintiff Joann Carbone and Defendants 2 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance 3 Company (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of 4 record, hereby stipulate to the following protective order: 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 7 Discovery in this Action is likely to involve production of confidential, 8 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 9 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 10 be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 11. enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this 12. Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 13. discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 14 only to the limited information that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 15 applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 16 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 17. confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 18 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks 19 permission from the court to file material under seal. 20 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 21 The Parties acknowledge that information produced in discovery, regardless 22 of its designation under this Order, may contain personal and health information 23. subject to the protections of, inter alia, the Health Insurance Portability and 24 Accountability Act of 1996, the applicable requirements of the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information and its implementing 26 regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (45 C.F.R. 27 ~—~Parts 160-64; HIPAA Privacy Regulations), and California Civil Code §§ 56 et seq., 8 2:23-CV-05948-AB-E 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 and 1798.82 et seq., which protect the confidentiality of individually-identifiable personal and health information. Discovery may also involve trade secrets, 3. customer and pricing lists, and other valuable research, development, commercial, 4 financial, technical, and/or proprietary information for which special protection 5 from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this 6 action is warranted. 7 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 8 resolution of disputes over the confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 9 protect information the Parties are entitled or required to keep confidential, to ensure 10 that the Parties are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the 12 litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is 13. ‘justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be 14 designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated 15 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 16 manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this 17 case. 182. DEFINITIONS 19 2.1 Action: Joann Carbone v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 20 Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company, Case No. 2:23-CV-05948-AB-E 21. (C.D. Cal.). 22 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 23 designation of Confidential or Highly Confidential Information under this Order. 24 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause 27 Statement. 28 2:23-CV-05948-AB-E 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 2.4 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” Information: “Confidential” 2 Information that is highly sensitive personally-identifying information or highly 3 sensitive and proprietary business information of the Designating Party, including, 4 without limitation, strategic planning information, negotiation strategies, proprietary 5 software or systems, proprietary edits or customizations to software, pricing 6 information, non-public product design or testing information, or extremely 7 sensitive, highly confidential, non-public information consisting either of trade 8 secrets or proprietary or other highly confidential business, financial, regulatory, or 9 strategic information, the disclosure of which would create a substantial risk of 10 competitive or business injury to the Designating Party. 11 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 12 their respective support staff). 13 2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 14 Discovery Material in this Action and designates it “CONFIDENTIAL” or 15 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all information, regardless of the 17. medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 18 other things, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, 19 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in 20 disclosures or responses to discovery in this Action. 21 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 22 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as 23 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 24 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action, as well as their support staff. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of 26 Record or any other outside counsel. 27 28 2:23-CV-05948-AB-E 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 4 Party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this Action and 5 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm 6 which has appeared on behalf of that Party, and includes support staff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 56
California CIV § 56

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joann Carbone v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joann-carbone-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-company-cacd-2024.