Joan Wesley Usher v. Frank O'connell, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Joan Wesley Usher v. Frank O'connell, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue

DecidedApril 25, 2025

DocketA25A1553

StatusPublished

This text of Joan Wesley Usher v. Frank O'connell, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue (Joan Wesley Usher v. Frank O'connell, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joan Wesley Usher v. Frank O'connell, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 25, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A1553. JOAN WESLEY USHER v. FRANK O’CONNELL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

The Georgia Department of Revenue issued assessments and demands for payments to Joan Wesley Usher, and the Georgia Tax Tribunal upheld the assessments and demands upon Usher’s challenge thereto. Usher then filed in superior court a petition for review of the Georgia Tax Tribunal’s decision. The superior court dismissed the petition for review, and Usher filed this direct appeal. The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that Usher was required to comply with the discretionary appeals procedure. We agree. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), a discretionary application is required from superior court orders “reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies[.]” “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Usher’s failure to comply with the discretionary appeals procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. See Best Tobacco, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 269 Ga. App. 484 (604 SE2d 578) (2004). For the foregoing reasons, the appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/25/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 25, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A1553. JOAN WESLEY USHER v. FRANK O’CONNELL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

The Georgia Department of Revenue issued assessments and demands for payments to Joan Wesley Usher, and the Georgia Tax Tribunal upheld the assessments and demands upon Usher’s challenge thereto. Usher then filed in superior court a petition for review of the Georgia Tax Tribunal’s decision. The superior court dismissed the petition for review, and Usher filed this direct appeal. The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that Usher was required to comply with the discretionary appeals procedure. We agree. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), a discretionary application is required from superior court orders “reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies[.]” “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Usher’s failure to comply with the discretionary appeals procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. See Best Tobacco, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 269 Ga. App. 484 (604 SE2d 578) (2004). For the foregoing reasons, the appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/25/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Joan Wesley Usher v. Frank O'connell, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Revenue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joan-wesley-usher-v-frank-oconnell-in-his-official-capacity-as-gactapp-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack