Joan Weiler v. Cranny
This text of 215 A.D.2d 752 (Joan Weiler v. Cranny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated January 25, 1994, as denied their motion for reargument.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
Because the plaintiffs’ motion to reargue and renew was not based on any additional, material facts, it is properly deemed a motion to reargue, and no appeal lies from an order denying [753]*753reargument (see, Savory v Romex Realty Corp., 194 AD2d 601; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D.2d 752, 627 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joan-weiler-v-cranny-nyappdiv-1995.