Joan D. v. Thomas P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joan D. v. Thomas P.

39 A.D.2d 759, 332 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4539

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 759 (Joan D. v. Thomas P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joan D. v. Thomas P., 39 A.D.2d 759, 332 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from three orders of filiation, all by the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 21, 1971 (each for a different one of three children). Orders reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petitions dismissed. Order of the same court dated December 8, 1971, which directed appellant to pay towards support of the children, vacated. Petitioner failed to sustain her burden of proving appellant’s responsibility by evidence so clear and convincing as to be entirely satisfactory (Matter of Mannain v. Lay, 33 A D 2d 1024, affd. 27 N Y 2d 690; Matter of Wickham v. Barbera, 279 App. Div. 953). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from three orders of filiation, all by the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 21, 1971 (each for a different one of three children). Orders reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petitions dismissed. Order of the same court dated December 8, 1971, which directed appellant to pay towards support of the children, vacated. Petitioner failed to sustain her burden of proving appellant’s responsibility by evidence so clear and convincing as to be entirely satisfactory (Matter of Mannain v. Lay, 33 A D 2d 1024, affd. 27 N Y 2d 690; Matter of Wickham v. Barbera, 279 App. Div. 953). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 759, 332 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joan-d-v-thomas-p-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack