Joan B. D. v. Horst B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joan B. D. v. Horst B.

65 A.D.2d 592, 409 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13259

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 592 (Joan B. D. v. Horst B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joan B. D. v. Horst B., 65 A.D.2d 592, 409 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a paternity proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, entered January 9, 1977, which, after a hearing, adjudged the appellant to be the father of petitioner’s child. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted. Order reversed, on the law and facts, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. Petitioner did not negate access by her husband during the time when conception occurred and thus failed to overcome the presumption of legitimacy (see Matter of Mannain v Lay, 27 NY2d 690; Matter of Irma N. v Carlos A. F., 46 AD2d 893). Petitioner, therefore, has not established paternity by clear and convincing evidence (see Gail M. v William P., 57 AD2d 859). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a paternity proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, entered January 9, 1977, which, after a hearing, adjudged the appellant to be the father of petitioner’s child. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted. Order reversed, on the law and facts, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed. Petitioner did not negate access by her husband during the time when conception occurred and thus failed to overcome the presumption of legitimacy (see Matter of Mannain v Lay, 27 NY2d 690; Matter of Irma N. v Carlos A. F., 46 AD2d 893). Petitioner, therefore, has not established paternity by clear and convincing evidence (see Gail M. v William P., 57 AD2d 859). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 592, 409 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joan-b-d-v-horst-b-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack