Jo Ann Hoffmann v. United States
This text of 21 F. App'x 528 (Jo Ann Hoffmann v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jo Ann Hoffmann appeals the district *529 court’s 1 dismissal of her Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) action for failure to serve the defendant. We grant her leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and we affirm the dismissal, modifying it to be without prejudice.
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Hoffmann’s action for insufficient service. See Bullock v. United States, 160 F.3d 441, 442 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam) (standard of review). In an FTCA action, the United States is the real defendant. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679. To serve the United States properly, Hoffmann had to deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the district in which the action was brought, as well as to the Attorney General of the United States. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(i). Hoffman served neither. Because more than 120 days had passed between the filing of the complaint and the dismissal, the district court could dismiss the action sua sponte; however, the dismissal should have been without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (where service is not timely made, “court ... shall dismiss the action without prejudice”).
The judgment is affirmed, but the dismissal is modified to be without prejudice.
. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. App'x 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jo-ann-hoffmann-v-united-states-ca8-2001.