Jo Ann and Leo Kucera v. John R. Courtney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jo Ann and Leo Kucera v. John R. Courtney

DecidedJanuary 23, 2003

Docket13-02-00718-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jo Ann and Leo Kucera v. John R. Courtney (Jo Ann and Leo Kucera v. John R. Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jo Ann and Leo Kucera v. John R. Courtney, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-718-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

_______________________________________________________________

JO ANN AND LEO KUCERA, Appellants,

v.

JOHN R. COURTNEY, Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Victoria County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Kennedy^{^[1]}

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JO ANN AND LEO KUCERA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 2-11,132. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that the trial court entered an order on December 31, 2002, granting appellants a new trial. Appellants state that their appeal is therefore moot and should be dismissed.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 23^rd day of January, 2003.

^{^[1]}Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 74.003 (Vernon 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-718-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

_______________________________________________________________

JO ANN AND LEO KUCERA, Appellants,

v.

JOHN R. COURTNEY, Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Victoria County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Kennedy^{^[1]}

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JO ANN AND LEO KUCERA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 2-11,132. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that the trial court entered an order on December 31, 2002, granting appellants a new trial. Appellants state that their appeal is therefore moot and should be dismissed.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 23^rd day of January, 2003.

^{^[1]}Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 74.003 (Vernon 1998).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jo Ann and Leo Kucera v. John R. Courtney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jo-ann-and-leo-kucera-v-john-r-courtney-texapp-2003.