Home/Supreme Court of Florida/J.M.A. v. C.C.A.

J.M.A. v. C.C.A.

803 So. 2d 705, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2281, 2001 WL 1511512
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 2001
DocketNo. SC96935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 803 So. 2d 705 (J.M.A. v. C.C.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.M.A. v. C.C.A., 803 So. 2d 705, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2281, 2001 WL 1511512 (Fla. 2001).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the opinion in C.C.A. v. J.M.A., 744 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in Dan[706]*706iel v. Daniel, 695 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.H.B. v. J.B.W.
826 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 So. 2d 705, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2281, 2001 WL 1511512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jma-v-cca-fla-2001.