J.M.A. v. C.C.A.

Supreme Court of Florida

J.M.A. v. C.C.A.

803 So. 2d 705, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2281, 2001 WL 1511512

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 29, 2001·No. No. SC96935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the opinion in C.C.A. v. J.M.A., 744 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in Dan[706]*706iel v. Daniel, 695 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the opinion in C.C.A. v. J.M.A., 744 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in Dan[706]*706iel v. Daniel, 695 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion.

J.M.A. v. C.C.A., 803 So. 2d 705, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2281, 2001 WL 1511512 (Fla. 2001).

Pincite

803 So. 2d 705 (J.M.A. v. C.C.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related