J.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services

136 So. 3d 1271, 2014 WL 1622050
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 2014·No. No. 2D13-5345·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

J.M., the Father, and D.B., the Mother, petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari to quash the disposition order that accepted the case plan requiring each to submit to a psychiatric evaluation1 and a substance abuse evaluation. The trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law because nothing in the record indicates that a substance abuse evaluation is relevant to the dependency or that it would meaningfully address the facts and circumstances which resulted in the children’s removal from the home. See, e.g., §§ 39.6011(2)(a), .6012(l)(a), .603(l)(f), Fla. Stat. (2013); C.T. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 84 So.3d 1231 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). As such, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari in part, quashing the disposition order to the extent that it requires the Father and the Mother to submit to substance abuse evaluations as part of the case plan. We note that the case plan may of course be amended pursuant to section 39.6013 and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.420 should the need arise.

Petition granted in part; order quashed in part.

DAVIS, C.J., and CRENSHAW, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 136 So. 3d 1271, 2014 WL 1622050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

136 So. 3d 1271 (J.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E.G. v. Dept. of Children and Familes
193 So. 3d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
M.B.W. v. Department of Children & Families
163 So. 3d 1229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
M.P., the father v. Department of Children And Families
159 So. 3d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)