J.M. ex rel. Magana v. Bratton
This text of 334 F. App'x 84 (J.M. ex rel. Magana v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
J.M., a minor, by and through his next friend Rafael A. Magana, appeals dismissal of his § 1983 action based on false arrest. We agree with the district court that claims asserted in this action are barred on the ground of res judicata. The complaint is not saved by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), as J.M. contends, for he never was convicted or sentenced as a result of juvenile proceedings initiated against him. Even if J.M. thought he had to wait for resolution of the juvenile proceedings, he had six months before the trial during which he could have amended the complaint. The false arrest claim could, and should, have been brought in J.M., a minor v. William Bratton et al., Case No. CV05-00846-DDP. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F. App'x 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jm-ex-rel-magana-v-bratton-ca9-2009.