Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/J.L. v. State

J.L. v. State

50 So. 3d 795, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 35, 2011 WL 92742
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 2011
DocketNo. 3D10-1282
StatusPublished

This text of 50 So. 3d 795 (J.L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.L. v. State, 50 So. 3d 795, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 35, 2011 WL 92742 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the adjudication of delinquency. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the written restitution order to reflect the oral pronouncement that restitution shall start when J.L. becomes employed. Additionally, as the trial court may not impose restitution once a notice of appeal has been filed, that order, as corrected pursuant to this opinion, needs to be re-entered after the conclusion of this appeal. See Rahaim v. State, 21 So.3d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); L’Heureux v. State, 968 So.2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RAHAIM v. State
21 So. 3d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
L'HEUREUX v. State
968 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 3d 795, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 35, 2011 WL 92742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jl-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.