J.L. v. State

458 So. 2d 61, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16479
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2155
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 61 (J.L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.L. v. State, 458 So. 2d 61, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16479 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of this court’s holdings which we have repeatedly reaffirmed — that mere presence by an accused at the scene of an offense which is committed by another, even under circumstances where there is knowledge that an offense is going to be committed, is not sufficient to establish aiding and abetting, G.C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.L.B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.O. v. State, 384 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) — the adjudication of delinquency for theft, on the facts of this case, cannot stand.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. State
458 So. 2d 61 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 61, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jl-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.