J.K.K. v. State

92 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 2913251, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11692
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-1977
StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 3d 299 (J.K.K. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.K.K. v. State, 92 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 2913251, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm J.K.K.’s adjudication of delinquency for burglary of a dwelling but reverse his adjudication of delinquency for grand theft. The state’s evidence of the value of the computer and cell phone charger which were stolen in the incident consisted solely of the owner’s testimony of the purchase price a year and a half prior to the incident. Such evidence is insufficient to establish the current value of these items. See Aycock v. State, 87 So.3d 1259, 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Lucky v. State, 25 So.3d 691, 692-93 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). We remand for entry of adjudication of petit theft as authorized by section 924.34, Florida Statutes (2006).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucky v. State
25 So. 3d 691 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Aycock v. State
87 So. 3d 1259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 3d 299, 2012 WL 2913251, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jkk-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.