JJ's Mae, Inc. v. MILLIKEN & COMPANY

763 So. 2d 1106
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 15, 1999
Docket98-1789, 98-4182
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 763 So. 2d 1106 (JJ's Mae, Inc. v. MILLIKEN & COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JJ's Mae, Inc. v. MILLIKEN & COMPANY, 763 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

763 So.2d 1106 (1999)

J.J.'S MAE, INC., Appellant,
v.
MILLIKEN & COMPANY, and Jonathan Birth, a minor, by and through his parents and next friends, David Birth and Sandra Birth, and David Birth, individually, and Sandra Birth, individually, Appellees.

Nos. 98-1789, 98-4182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 15, 1999.

*1107 Clifford M. Miller and Glenn Webber of Law Office of Bohdan Neswiacheny, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Benjamin L. Bedard and Paul F. Grondahl of Roberts & Reynolds, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Milliken & Company.

WARNER, C.J.

We reverse the award of attorney's fees recovered pursuant to an offer of judgment. The offer contained various conditions requiring the offeree to satisfy certain liens. In Martin v. Brousseau, 564 So.2d 240, 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), we held that an offer of judgment which imposed conditions was invalid under the rule and statute. When the court decided Martin, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, regarding offers of judgment, did not allow for any conditions to be included in an offer. Although the rule has subsequently been amended to permit the inclusion of conditions, see rule 1.442(c)(2)(C), appellant was entitled to consider the offer under the law in effect at the time the offer was made. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Jones Boatyard, Inc., 611 So.2d 512, 513-14 (Fla.1993); Brodose v. School Bd. of Pinellas County, 622 So.2d 513, 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Thus, the conditions of this offer rendered it invalid, and the attorney's fee award made pursuant to the offer is reversed.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dryden v. Pedemonti
910 So. 2d 854 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Gulf Coast Transp., Inc. v. Padron
782 So. 2d 464 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 So. 2d 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jjs-mae-inc-v-milliken-company-fladistctapp-1999.