J.J.L.J.J., S.A. v. Elides Arraiz
This text of J.J.L.J.J., S.A. v. Elides Arraiz (J.J.L.J.J., S.A. v. Elides Arraiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal Stateof Florida
Opinion filed August 27, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D24-0040 Lower Tribunal No. 18-22816
J.J.L.J.J., S.A., et al., Appellants,
vs.
Elides Arraiz, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria de Jesus Santovenia, Judge.
The Law Offices of Alan Dagen, P.A., and Alan P. Dagen (Weston), for appellants.
Nordlund P.A, and Randall Nordlund; Cuevas, García & Torres, P.A., and Jose A. Torres, for appellees.
Before SCALES, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Haas Automation, Inc. v. Fox, 243 So. 3d 1017, 1023
(Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“We review a judgment rendered after a bench trial to
ensure that the trial court's findings of fact are supported by competent,
substantial evidence.”); Underwater Eng'g Services, Inc. v. Util. Bd. of City of
Key West, 194 So. 3d 437, 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (The trial court’s findings
of fact “will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous.”) (citation
omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
J.J.L.J.J., S.A. v. Elides Arraiz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jjljj-sa-v-elides-arraiz-fladistctapp-2025.