J.J. v. State
970 So. 2d 388, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.J. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21315 →
Opinion
Affirmed. Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Co., 336 So.2d 566, 569 (Fla.1976) (stating that a writing used to jog a witness’s memory may be admissible on some independent ground); T.B.S. v. State, 935 So.2d 98, 99 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (stating the fact-finder can use life experience to find that the statutory damage threshold has been met for self-evident repairs).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J.J. v. State, 970 So. 2d 388, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
970 So. 2d 388 (J.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc.
336 So. 2d 566 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
T.B.S. v. State
935 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)