J.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.J. v. State

438 So. 2d 988, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24506

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1983·No. No. 83-905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the adjudication of delinquency based upon the findings that the respondent was guilty of burglary and theft. The determination of grand theft is reduced to petit theft because the evidence was insufficient to establish that the value of the property stolen was over $100.00 at the time of the incident. Beasley v. State, 305 So.2d 285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 180 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the adjudication of delinquency based upon the findings that the respondent was guilty of burglary and theft. The determination of grand theft is reduced to petit theft because the evidence was insufficient to establish that the value of the property stolen was over $100.00 at the time of the incident. Beasley v. State, 305 So.2d 285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So.2d 180 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed as modified.

J.J. v. State, 438 So. 2d 988, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24506 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

438 So. 2d 988 (J.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related