J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc. v. Yazowski
207 A.D.2d 1033, 617 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have granted plaintiff leave to amend its complaint. Absent prejudice or surprise, leave to amend should be freely granted (CPLR 3025 [b]). We do not rule upon the merits or legal sufficiency of the proposed amendment (see, Kusak v Allstate Ins. Co., 190 AD2d 1050). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.—Amended Complaint.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc. v. Yazowski, 207 A.D.2d 1033, 617 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
207 A.D.2d 1033 (J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc. v. Yazowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kusak v. Allstate Insurance
190 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)