Jinna E. Miller v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, C.D. California·Decided April 3, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-05133·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JULIAN FISHER as brought through his Case No. 2:22-cv-05133-SB (ASx) Conservator Jinna Miller Plaintiff, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES and Defendants. 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. This action is likely to involve the production of “Confidential Information” for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Confidential Information is defined herein to include information that is not in the public domain and contains employee information, financial data and information, and any other information that may reasonably be characterized by a party as intellectual property, a trade secret, or confidential and proprietary information, including information protected from disclosure by FDA regulations including 21 C.F.R.§ 20.63 and 21 C.F.R. § 314.430; information provided to Defendants Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) by third parties with the expectation that Defendants would keep such information confidential or pursuant to contracts that expressly require Defendants to maintain the confidentiality of the information or that is otherwise protected from disclosure by statute; names and other identifying information of patients in clinical studies or adverse event reports as well as the physicians who reported to Defendants adverse events concerning one of their patients; confidential client lists; information that is not generally available to the public that relates to, reflects or was or is used to help form Defendants’ research, business and legal strategies, such as information that is not generally available to the public that relates to, reflects or was or is used to help form Defendants’ research, business and legal strategies, such as business or marketing plans or studies; sales data that is kept confidential; pricing and financial information; discount information; rebate information; plaintiff medical records and personal financial information; non-public financial data that would reveal Defendants’ future strategic commitments; information relating to job performance evaluations or disciplinary actions; information that is not generally available to the public that relates to consumer purchasing habits, pricing information, sales techniques, sales volumes; and information concerning communication with government agencies. For purposes of discovery, “trade secret” shall include any formula, compilation, program, plan, device, design, method, technique, process or other information used in the Producing Party’s business and for which confidentiality or sensitivity has been reasonably maintained; and “proprietary” information shall mean any information in which a party has a protectable interest, including information regarding a party’s finances, processes, products, services, research and development, sales and marketing, strategies and technologies, trade secret or other confidential research, development or commercial information or other non-public information about the financial and business affairs of the parties. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: JULIAN FISHER as brought through his Conservator JINNA MILLER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., No. 2:22-cv-05133-SB (ASx) 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Privileged Information: any materials that contain information protected from disclosure as defined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the Federal Rules of Evidence. 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jinna E. Miller v. Abbott Laboratories, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Jinna E. Miller v. Abbott Laboratories (Jinna E. Miller v. Abbott Laboratories) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related