Jinkinson v. Lake County Criminal Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Jinkinson v. Lake County Criminal Court

157 N.E.2d 287, 239 Ind. 703, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 228

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 1959·No. No. 0-553·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

Relator asks that a writ of mandate issue for the respondent to show cause why he should not hear and determine a petition for error coram nobis, which proceedings were pending in the Lake Criminal Court.

It now being shown to this court that said proceedings have been held and fully adjudicated, the subject of the petition is now considered moot and the same is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 157 N. E. 2d 287.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Relator asks that a writ of mandate issue for the respondent to show cause why he should not hear and determine a petition for error coram nobis, which proceedings were pending in the Lake Criminal Court.

It now being shown to this court that said proceedings have been held and fully adjudicated, the subject of the petition is now considered moot and the same is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 157 N. E. 2d 287.

Jinkinson v. Lake County Criminal Court, 157 N.E.2d 287, 239 Ind. 703, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 228 (Ind. 1959).

Pincite

157 N.E.2d 287 (Jinkinson v. Lake County Criminal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.