Jingles, Joey AKA Jingles, Joseph Earl

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 12, 2018
• Docket: WR-20,897-07
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-20,897-07

EX PARTE JOSEPH EARL JINGLES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 5544 IN THE 506TH DISTRICT COURT FROM WALLER COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

building and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he is being denied credit for time spent released on parole prior to

revocation. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Spann, 132

S.W.3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we

held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. 2

The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General

Counsel to file an affidavit listing Applicant’s sentence begin date and the dates of issuance of any

parole-revocation warrants leading to the revocation of such parole or mandatory supervision. The

affidavit should state whether Applicant is serving a sentence for, or has previously been convicted

of, an offense which was listed in TEX . GOV ’T CODE § 508.149(a) at the time of Applicant’s

revocation. The affidavit should also address how much time was remaining on this sentence on the

date that Applicant was released on parole or mandatory supervision, and how much time Applicant

spent on release before the issuance of the parole-revocation warrant. The affidavit should state

whether or not Applicant is receiving credit for any of the time spent on parole. Finally, the affidavit

should indicate whether or not Applicant has submitted his claim to the time credit resolution system

of TDCJ, and if so, the date when the claim was submitted.

The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant

at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

has properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by TEX . GOV ’T CODE § 501.0081(b)-

(c). The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as to whether Applicant is eligible to

earn street time credit, and if so, whether he is entitled to credit for his time spent on release. The

trial court shall also make findings and conclusions as to whether Applicant is receiving the proper

amount of time credit for that time. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for 3

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 12, 2018 Do not publish