Jin Qing Wang v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Jin Qing Wang v. Holder

424 F. App'x 248

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2011·No. No. 10-2037·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jin Qing Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2010). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Jin Qing Wang (B.I.A. Aug. 11, 2010). [249]*249We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jin Qing Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2010). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Jin Qing Wang (B.I.A. Aug. 11, 2010). [249]*249We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Jin Qing Wang v. Holder, 424 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

424 F. App'x 248 (Jin Qing Wang v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related