Jin Mei Liu v. Lamberta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jin Mei Liu v. Lamberta

58 A.D.3d 687, 870 N.Y.S.2d 795

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.3d 687 (Jin Mei Liu v. Lamberta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jin Mei Liu v. Lamberta, 58 A.D.3d 687, 870 N.Y.S.2d 795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), entered October 25, 2007, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 23, 2007, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Jin Mei Liu did not sustain a serious injuiy within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), dismissed the complaint.

[688]*688Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Jin Mei Liu did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Skelos, J.E, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), entered October 25, 2007, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 23, 2007, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Jin Mei Liu did not sustain a serious injuiy within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), dismissed the complaint.

[688]*688Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Jin Mei Liu did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Skelos, J.E, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.3d 687, 870 N.Y.S.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jin-mei-liu-v-lamberta-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack