Jimmy Wayne Cumpian v. Jay Lack
This text of Jimmy Wayne Cumpian v. Jay Lack (Jimmy Wayne Cumpian v. Jay Lack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
JIMMY WAYNE CUMPIAN, Appellant,
JAY LACK, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 24, 2008. On October 2, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. No response has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 4th day of December, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimmy Wayne Cumpian v. Jay Lack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-wayne-cumpian-v-jay-lack-texapp-2008.