Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 10, 2008·No. 01-07-00275-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued April 10, 2008





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-07-00275-CV

____________



JIMMY VAUGHAN D/B/A BOTANICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN, Appellant



V.



SIREN STEEL, INC., Appellee



On Appeal from the 113 th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-43991



MEMORANDUM OPINION

We received communication from the mediator on October 23, 2007, stating that the parties had settled. Because no motion to dismiss was filed, on February 19, 2008, the Court issued a notice warning that unless, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the parties to the appeal demonstrate that there was a live controversy between them as to the merits of this appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. See Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App. -Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ) (existence of actual controversy is essential to exercise of appellate jurisdiction). Appellant has filed no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Alcala.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc. (Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks
562 S.W.2d 933 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)