Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.
This text of Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc. (Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 10, 2008
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-07-00275-CV
JIMMY VAUGHAN D/B/A BOTANICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN, Appellant
V.
SIREN STEEL, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 113 th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2006-43991
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We received communication from the mediator on October 23, 2007, stating that the parties had settled. Because no motion to dismiss was filed, on February 19, 2008, the Court issued a notice warning that unless, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the parties to the appeal demonstrate that there was a live controversy between them as to the merits of this appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. See Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App. -Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ) (existence of actual controversy is essential to exercise of appellate jurisdiction). Appellant has filed no response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Alcala.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimmy Vaughan D/B/A Botanical Landscape Design v. Siren Steel, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-vaughan-dba-botanical-landscape-design-v-sir-texapp-2008.