Jimmy Neil Farmer v. Kimberly Joyce Farmer

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2002
Docket13-02-00570-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jimmy Neil Farmer v. Kimberly Joyce Farmer (Jimmy Neil Farmer v. Kimberly Joyce Farmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jimmy Neil Farmer v. Kimberly Joyce Farmer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-02-570-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

JIMMY NEIL FARMER,                                                           Appellant,

                                                   v.

KIMBERLY JOYCE FARMER,                                                    Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 130th District Court

                                of Matagorda County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

                   Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, JIMMY NEIL FARMER, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, in cause number 00-J-0480-D.  Judgment in this cause was signed on October 19, 2000.  No timely motion for new trial was filed.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant=s notice of appeal was due on November 18, 2000, but was not filed until October 21, 2002. 

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed.  To date, appellant has failed to correct the defect.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant=s failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of December, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jimmy Neil Farmer v. Kimberly Joyce Farmer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-neil-farmer-v-kimberly-joyce-farmer-texapp-2002.