Jimmy Lee Robinson v. State
This text of Jimmy Lee Robinson v. State (Jimmy Lee Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-08-00411-CR & 04-08-00412-CR
Jimmy Lee ROBINSON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2007-CR-4139 & 2007-CR-4140 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 23, 2008
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in each of these appeals states that the case is a “plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure provides that an appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has
the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
In each of these appeals, the clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment
assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the 08-00411-CR 08-00412-CR
defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no
right of appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). In addition, appellant’s counsel has filed a letter in
which she states that she has reviewed the electronic judicial records and “can find no right of appeal
for Appellant;” counsel concedes that the appeal must be dismissed. We construe this notice as an
indication that appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has
the right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177
(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s
counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals
are dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimmy Lee Robinson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-lee-robinson-v-state-texapp-2008.