Jimmy Garcia v. La Paletera Franchise Systems, Inc. and Emerita Salazar

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 26, 2009·No. 13-04-00001-CV·Published

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-00001-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________



JIMMY GARCIA, Appellant,



v.



LA PALETERA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS,

INC. AND EMERITA SALAZAR, Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



This appeal was abated by this Court on May 13, 2004, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On January 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal. The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in reinstatement and dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 26th day of February, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimmy Garcia v. La Paletera Franchise Systems, Inc. and Emerita Salazar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Jimmy Garcia v. La Paletera Franchise Systems, Inc. and Emerita Salazar (Jimmy Garcia v. La Paletera Franchise Systems, Inc. and Emerita Salazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362