Jimmy Darrell Craig, Jr. v. State
This text of Jimmy Darrell Craig, Jr. v. State (Jimmy Darrell Craig, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00027-CR
JIMMY DARRELL CRAIG, JR., Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 220th District Court Hamilton County, Texas Trial Court No. CR07994
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed what appeared to be a pro se interlocutory notice of appeal of the
trial court’s denial of his motion for bond reduction. The Clerk of the Court notified
Appellant that this case was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction and that the
Court might dismiss his appeal unless he showed grounds for continuing it. Appellant
did not respond to the Clerk’s letter.
This Court lacks jurisdiction over a trial court‘s denial of a motion for bond
reduction when the appeal is not from the trial court’s denial of a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant sought bond reduction. See Benford v.
State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); see also Sanchez v. State, 340
S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.). Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed February 26, 2015 Do not publish [CR25]
Craig v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimmy Darrell Craig, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-darrell-craig-jr-v-state-texapp-2015.