Jimmy C. Wingo v. Hilton Butler, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, Louisiana

Fifth Circuit

Jimmy C. Wingo v. Hilton Butler, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, Louisiana

820 F.2d 116, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8129

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 12, 1987

Docket87-4439

StatusPublished

This text of 820 F.2d 116 (Jimmy C. Wingo v. Hilton Butler, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jimmy C. Wingo v. Hilton Butler, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, Louisiana, 820 F.2d 116, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8129 (5th Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Wingo has been sentenced to death by the Louisiana court for the fourth time for the murders he committed in 1982. We studied his arguments and the full trial record upon his prior habeas appeal. See Wingo v. Blackburn, 783 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir.1986), on rehearing 786 F.2d 654. In this successive writ petitioner raises seven points and thereby repeats some of his arguments of the prior appeal. These points have all been answered by the memorandum ruling of the district court, and nothing needs be added to what Judge Duhe has said. There is no substantial showing of the denial of a federal right.

We grant IFP, deny the application for certificate of probable cause, and deny the application for stay of execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Wingo has been sentenced to death by the Louisiana court for the fourth time for the murders he committed in 1982. We studied his arguments and the full trial record upon his prior habeas appeal. See Wingo v. Blackburn, 783 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir.1986), on rehearing 786 F.2d 654. In this successive writ petitioner raises seven points and thereby repeats some of his arguments of the prior appeal. These points have all been answered by the memorandum ruling of the district court, and nothing needs be added to what Judge Duhe has said. There is no substantial showing of the denial of a federal right.

We grant IFP, deny the application for certificate of probable cause, and deny the application for stay of execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

820 F.2d 116, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-c-wingo-v-hilton-butler-warden-louisiana-state-penitentiary-at-ca5-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack