Jimmy C. Olanipekum v. Jesus Fernando Aguinaga

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 9, 2024
Docket14-24-00094-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jimmy C. Olanipekum v. Jesus Fernando Aguinaga (Jimmy C. Olanipekum v. Jesus Fernando Aguinaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jimmy C. Olanipekum v. Jesus Fernando Aguinaga, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9, 2024

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00094-CV

JIMMY C. OLANIPEKUM, Appellant

V. JESUS FERNANDO AGUINAGA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020-77599

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed October 4, 2023. Appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration on November 3, 2023. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed February 6, 2024. When appellant has filed a timely post-judgment motion, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15- day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

On April 18, 2024, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response does not demonstrate that we have jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jimmy C. Olanipekum v. Jesus Fernando Aguinaga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-c-olanipekum-v-jesus-fernando-aguinaga-texapp-2024.