Jimmy Brown v. Gregory Harper
This text of 642 F. App'x 663 (Jimmy Brown v. Gregory Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Jimmy Brown appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claim that police officer Gregory Harper. *664 illegally seized him. Brown has also moved for this court to recuse itself.
To begin, we deny Brown’s motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 455 (providing standard for disqualification of judges). Additionally, after careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir.2014) (standard of review); United States v. Carpenter, 462 F.3d 981, 985 (8th Cir.2006) (seizure does ' not occur simply because officer approaches individual and asks few questions, so long as reasonable person would feel free to disregard officer and go about his business). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
642 F. App'x 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmy-brown-v-gregory-harper-ca8-2016.