Jimmy Barela v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0172-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL E
JUNE 9, 2003
JIMMY BARELA,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 45,848-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING
Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1 Appellant Jimmy Barela, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. The cause was previously abated; we now reinstate it. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Brian Quinn
Do not publish. Justice
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.
Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jimmy Barela v. State (Jimmy Barela v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.