Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee

338 F.2d 1004
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 8, 1964·No. 7800_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this habeas corpus proceedings, the petitioner attacks his judgment of sentence contending that a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” The same issues presented here were before the trial Court in a former 2255 proceedings, affirmed in this Court in Sullivan v. United States, 10 Cir., 315 F.2d 304. The remedy under Sec. 2255 is not inadequate or ineffective even though unsuccessful.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee, 338 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1964).

338 F.2d 1004 (Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related