Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee
This text of 338 F.2d 1004 (Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this habeas corpus proceedings, the petitioner attacks his judgment of sentence contending that a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” The same issues presented here were before the trial Court in a former 2255 proceedings, affirmed in this Court in Sullivan v. United States, 10 Cir., 315 F.2d 304. The remedy under Sec. 2255 is not inadequate or ineffective even though unsuccessful.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 F.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmie-w-sullivan-v-j-c-taylor-warden-united-states-penitentiary-ca10-1964.