Jimmie Nelson v. Martin Gorski, Officer Michael Carrier, Investigator Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer

Fourth Circuit

Jimmie Nelson v. Martin Gorski, Officer Michael Carrier, Investigator Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39559, 1995 WL 752900

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 1995

Docket95-6440

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 127 (Jimmie Nelson v. Martin Gorski, Officer Michael Carrier, Investigator Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jimmie Nelson v. Martin Gorski, Officer Michael Carrier, Investigator Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer, 72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39559, 1995 WL 752900 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jimmie NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Martin GORSKI, Officer; Michael Carrier, Investigator;
Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6440.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Jimmie Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Gorski, No. CA-94-224-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jimmie NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Martin GORSKI, Officer; Michael Carrier, Investigator;
Angela P. Ruing, Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6440.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Jimmie Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Gorski, No. CA-94-224-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39559, 1995 WL 752900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimmie-nelson-v-martin-gorski-officer-michael-carr-ca4-1995.