Jiminez v. District Court

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Jiminez v. District Court

9 P.R. 267

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided September 1, 1905·No. No. 7·Published

Opinion

Opinion of

Mr. Justice Figueras.

The writ of mandamus is a highly privileged remedy which does not lie when, as in this case, the parties interested can enforce their rights in some other manner.

In view of the provisions of the act of the Legislative Assembly, approved March 12, 1903, the second subdivision of article 170 and article 176 of the Regulations for the execution of the Mortgage Law, and section 295 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the writ of mandamus applied for is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of

Mr. Justice Figueras.

The writ of mandamus is a highly privileged remedy which does not lie when, as in this case, the parties interested can enforce their rights in some other manner.

In view of the provisions of the act of the Legislative Assembly, approved March 12, 1903, the second subdivision of article 170 and article 176 of the Regulations for the execution of the Mortgage Law, and section 295 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the writ of mandamus applied for is hereby denied.

Jiminez v. District Court, 9 P.R. 267 (prsupreme 1905).

Pincite

9 P.R. 267 (Jiminez v. District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.