Jimil Brown v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 26, 2015
• Docket: 05-14-00491-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 26, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00490-CR No. 05-14-00491-CR No. 05-14-00492-CR No. 05-14-00493-CR

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-33944-M, F10-33945-M, F12-33914-M, F12-34048-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Bridges

Jimil Johnte Brown appeals four convictions, after adjudication of his guilt, for two

offenses of delivery of marijuana in an amount over one-fourth ounce, one theft of property

offense, and one offense of possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram. See TEX.

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 481.115(a), (b), 481.120(a), (b)(3) (West 2010); TEX. PENAL

CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment in

each case at twenty months’ confinement in a state jail. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a

brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a

copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he

did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 140490F.U05

/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

‐2‐

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00490-CR V. F10-33944-M). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered May 26, 2015

‐3‐

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00491-CR V. F10-33945-M). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered May 26, 2015.

‐4‐

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00492-CR V. F12-33914-M). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

‐5‐

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00493-CR V. F12-34048-M). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

‐6‐