Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp.

870 So. 2d 873, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2004 WL 305749
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-34
StatusPublished

This text of 870 So. 2d 873 (Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp., 870 So. 2d 873, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2004 WL 305749 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

GERSTEN, J.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee WSUA Broadcasting Corporation’s motion for sanctions and to strike sham pleadings. The record fully supports the trial court’s findings that appellant Luis G. Jimenez’s complaint contained false factual averments and was tantamount to a fraud upon the court. See Meadows v. Edwards, 82 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1955); Rhea v. Hackney, 117 Fla. 62, 157 So. 190 (1934); City of Miami v. Urban League of Greater Miami, Inc., 849 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanono v. Murphy
723 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Meadows v. Edwards
82 So. 2d 733 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Rhea v. Hackney
157 So. 190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
City of Miami v. Urban League of Greater Miami, Inc.
849 So. 2d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 So. 2d 873, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2004 WL 305749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-v-wsua-broadcasting-corp-fladistctapp-2004.