Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp.

870 So. 2d 873, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2004 WL 305749

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2004·No. No. 3D03-34·Published

Opinion

GERSTEN, J.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee WSUA Broadcasting Corporation’s motion for sanctions and to strike sham pleadings. The record fully supports the trial court’s findings that appellant Luis G. Jimenez’s complaint contained false factual averments and was tantamount to a fraud upon the court. See Meadows v. Edwards, 82 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1955); Rhea v. Hackney, 117 Fla. 62, 157 So. 190 (1934); City of Miami v. Urban League of Greater Miami, Inc., 849 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GERSTEN, J.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee WSUA Broadcasting Corporation’s motion for sanctions and to strike sham pleadings. The record fully supports the trial court’s findings that appellant Luis G. Jimenez’s complaint contained false factual averments and was tantamount to a fraud upon the court. See Meadows v. Edwards, 82 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1955); Rhea v. Hackney, 117 Fla. 62, 157 So. 190 (1934); City of Miami v. Urban League of Greater Miami, Inc., 849 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp., 870 So. 2d 873, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1319, 2004 WL 305749 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

870 So. 2d 873 (Jimenez v. WSUA Broadcasting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related