Jimenez v. State

27 So. 3d 758, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1357, 2010 WL 445914
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 2010·No. No. 3D09-316·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Diego Jimenez (“the defendant”) appeals from a trial court order prohibiting him from filing further pro se postconviction motions. Although the defendant has filed three postconviction relief motions, each addressed a different, legally cognizable issue. Thus, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that the defendant abused his right to pro se access by filing frivolous motions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); Mims v. State, 994 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Accordingly, we reverse the order prohibiting the defendant from filing further pro se motions from his conviction and sentence.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimenez v. State, 27 So. 3d 758, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1357, 2010 WL 445914 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

27 So. 3d 758 (Jimenez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jimenez v. State
196 So. 3d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)