Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jimenez v. State

Jimenez v. State

842 So. 2d 243, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4757, 2003 WL 1823533
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jimenez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6933 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2003·No. No. 2D02-4344·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

We affirm the order denying Kelvis Jimenez’s motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) without prejudice to whatever right he may have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Collins v. State, 819 So.2d 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Blake v. State, 807 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimenez v. State, 842 So. 2d 243, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4757, 2003 WL 1823533 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

842 So. 2d 243 (Jimenez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. State
819 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Blake v. State
807 So. 2d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)