Jimenez v. Reboredo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jimenez v. Reboredo

559 So. 2d 386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2376, 1990 WL 40319

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1990·No. No. 89-2029·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Roberto Jimenez and Maria Jimenez, appeal a final summary judgment in favor of appellee, Jose Reboredo d/b/a Concrete Form & Lumber Co., on appellants’ action for negligence. We affirm the final summary judgment based upon the holding that appellee had no duty to give appellant Roberto Jimenez notice or warning of an obvious danger. Crawford v. Miller, 542 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Storr v. Proctor, 490 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 546 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Roberto Jimenez and Maria Jimenez, appeal a final summary judgment in favor of appellee, Jose Reboredo d/b/a Concrete Form & Lumber Co., on appellants’ action for negligence. We affirm the final summary judgment based upon the holding that appellee had no duty to give appellant Roberto Jimenez notice or warning of an obvious danger. Crawford v. Miller, 542 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Storr v. Proctor, 490 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 546 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Jimenez v. Reboredo, 559 So. 2d 386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2376, 1990 WL 40319 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

559 So. 2d 386 (Jimenez v. Reboredo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related