Jimenez v. Reboredo

559 So. 2d 386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2376, 1990 WL 40319
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2029
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 386 (Jimenez v. Reboredo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jimenez v. Reboredo, 559 So. 2d 386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2376, 1990 WL 40319 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Roberto Jimenez and Maria Jimenez, appeal a final summary judgment in favor of appellee, Jose Reboredo d/b/a Concrete Form & Lumber Co., on appellants’ action for negligence. We affirm the final summary judgment based upon the holding that appellee had no duty to give appellant Roberto Jimenez notice or warning of an obvious danger. Crawford v. Miller, 542 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Storr v. Proctor, 490 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 546 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinez v. Industrial Waste Service, Inc.
776 So. 2d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 386, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2376, 1990 WL 40319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-v-reboredo-fladistctapp-1990.