Jimenez v. Palacios
This text of Jimenez v. Palacios (Jimenez v. Palacios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
RODOLFO ENRIQUE JIMÉNEZ, § ASDRÚBAL CHAVEZ, IRIS § MEDINA, MARCOS ROJAS, JOSÉ § No. 399, 2019 ALEJANDRO ROJAS, and § FERNANDO DE QUINTAL, § Court Below – Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware Plaintiffs/Counterclaim § Defendants Below/ § Appellants, § C.A. No. 2019-0490 § v. § § LUISA PALACIOS, EDGAR § RINCÓN, FERNANDO VERA, § ELIO TORTOLERO, ANDRÉS § PADILLA, ÁNGEL OLMETA, § JAVIER TROCONIS, LUIS § URDANETA, and RICK ESSER, § § Defendants/Counterclaim § Plaintiffs Below/ § Appellees. §
Submitted: July 8, 2020 Decided: July 22, 2020
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.
ORDER
This 22nd day of July 2020, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs
and the record on appeal, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for
the reasons stated in its August 12, 2019 opinion.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimenez v. Palacios, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-v-palacios-del-2020.