Jimenez v. Kimmerling

95 A.D.3d 953, 943 N.Y.S.2d 756
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 95 A.D.3d 953 (Jimenez v. Kimmerling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jimenez v. Kimmerling, 95 A.D.3d 953, 943 N.Y.S.2d 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered October 12, 2011, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained when his vehicle was struck by the defendant’s vehicle. In support of this motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiff [954]*954established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. However, in opposition, the defendant raised a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability should have been denied. Skelos, J.E, Eng, Belen and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Qi Sheng Lu v. World Wide Travel of Greater New York, Ltd.
111 A.D.3d 690 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 953, 943 N.Y.S.2d 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-v-kimmerling-nyappdiv-2012.