Jimenez v. Kimmerling

95 A.D.3d 953, 943 N.Y.S.2d 756
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 8, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered October 12, 2011, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained when his vehicle was struck by the defendant’s vehicle. In support of this motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiff [954] established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. However, in opposition, the defendant raised a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability should have been denied. Skelos, J.E, Eng, Belen and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimenez v. Kimmerling, 95 A.D.3d 953, 943 N.Y.S.2d 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

95 A.D.3d 953 (Jimenez v. Kimmerling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Qi Sheng Lu v. World Wide Travel of Greater New York, Ltd.
111 A.D.3d 690 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)