Jimenez v. Iron Master Corp.

292 A.D.2d 426, 738 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2541
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated November 8, 2000, as granted those branches of the respective motions of the defendants Stillwell Supply Corp. and Windhem Machine Corp. which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondent Stillwell Supply Corp.

The respondents established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to establish any reasonable probability that the respondents manufactured and distributed the defective product which caused plaintiff’s accident (see, Healey v Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 87 NY2d 596; D'Amico v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 173 AD2d 263). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the respondents’ respective motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimenez v. Iron Master Corp., 292 A.D.2d 426, 738 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 426 (Jimenez v. Iron Master Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyminskyy v. Sand Man Bldg. Materials, Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)