FLOR JIMENEZ, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER V. (ECF No. 32) HYATT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 32), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.-R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 90 clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 92 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 94 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 37 Dated: April 7, 2025 C (i s 4, jime3028.23 CHI SOO KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Nathan D. Chapman (SBN 338735) nchapman@kcozlaw.com Jonathan Marvisi (SBN 319170) jmarvisi@kcozlaw.com 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2225 Telephone: (404) 400-7300 Facsimile: (404) 400-7333
Attorneys for Defendant Hyatt Corporation
[Additional counsel listed on next page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FLOR JIMENEZ, individually and on Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK
behalf of all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER
vs. Compl. Filed: Dec. 28, 2023 HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendant. Thiago M. Coelho (SBN 324715) thiago.coelho@wilshirelawfirm.com Lauren Lendzion (SBN 239184) lauren.lendzion@wilshirelawfirm.com Jennifer M. Leinbach (SBN 281404) jennifer.leinbach@wilshirelawfirm.com Jesenia A. Martinez (SBN 316969) jesenia.martinez@wilshirelawfirm.com Jesse S. Chen (SBN 336294) jesse.chen@wilshirelawfirm.com N. Nima Shamtoub (SBN 343853) nima.shamtoub@wilshirelawfirm.com 3055 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213) 381-9988 Facsimile: (213) 381-9989
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class Plaintiff Flor Jimenez and Defendant Hyatt Corporation agree to and submit this Stipulated Protective Order ("Order") and respectfully request that the Court approve and issue the Order. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. This Protective Order is necessary to protect confidential records relating to Plaintiff, the putative class members, and Defendant as described below in Section 2. Due to potential third parties being involved that may gain access to Plaintiff’s personal information, and/or Defendant’s proprietary business records through the course of litigation, a protective order is necessary. The Parties request a protective order as third parties that might be involved in this litigation would not be subject to any private agreement between the Parties and the only means to prevent third parties from unauthorized disclosure of private, confidential, and proprietary records is through this Court issuing a protective order. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and/or applicable federal privileges. The Parties seek to protect confidential personal information relating to Plaintiff or the putative class members, , and other records that contain personal information relating to Plaintiff or the putative class members (e.g., Social Security numbers, home addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, drivers’ licenses, and other private identifiers). The Parties also seek to protect Defendant’s business and proprietary records that are not readily known to the public. Specifically, this action is likely to involve trade secrets related to records of website development, maintenance, operation, and improvements, internet archives, system documentation, software, engineering information, vendor information, information regarding business relationships with third parties, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Public disclosure of this confidential information could cause significant harm to both parties: for Defendant, revealing proprietary methods and technical implementations to competitors could result in competitive disadvantage; for Plaintiff and putative class members, disclosure of sensitive personal information could result in privacy violations and potential identity theft risks. Both Parties have legitimate interests in ensuring such information remains confidential during litigation. 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL." 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an Expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
FLOR JIMENEZ, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER V. (ECF No. 32) HYATT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 32), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.-R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 90 clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 92 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 94 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 37 Dated: April 7, 2025 C (i s 4, jime3028.23 CHI SOO KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Nathan D. Chapman (SBN 338735) nchapman@kcozlaw.com Jonathan Marvisi (SBN 319170) jmarvisi@kcozlaw.com 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2225 Telephone: (404) 400-7300 Facsimile: (404) 400-7333
Attorneys for Defendant Hyatt Corporation
[Additional counsel listed on next page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FLOR JIMENEZ, individually and on Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK
behalf of all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER
vs. Compl. Filed: Dec. 28, 2023 HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendant. Thiago M. Coelho (SBN 324715) thiago.coelho@wilshirelawfirm.com Lauren Lendzion (SBN 239184) lauren.lendzion@wilshirelawfirm.com Jennifer M. Leinbach (SBN 281404) jennifer.leinbach@wilshirelawfirm.com Jesenia A. Martinez (SBN 316969) jesenia.martinez@wilshirelawfirm.com Jesse S. Chen (SBN 336294) jesse.chen@wilshirelawfirm.com N. Nima Shamtoub (SBN 343853) nima.shamtoub@wilshirelawfirm.com 3055 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213) 381-9988 Facsimile: (213) 381-9989
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class Plaintiff Flor Jimenez and Defendant Hyatt Corporation agree to and submit this Stipulated Protective Order ("Order") and respectfully request that the Court approve and issue the Order. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. This Protective Order is necessary to protect confidential records relating to Plaintiff, the putative class members, and Defendant as described below in Section 2. Due to potential third parties being involved that may gain access to Plaintiff’s personal information, and/or Defendant’s proprietary business records through the course of litigation, a protective order is necessary. The Parties request a protective order as third parties that might be involved in this litigation would not be subject to any private agreement between the Parties and the only means to prevent third parties from unauthorized disclosure of private, confidential, and proprietary records is through this Court issuing a protective order. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and/or applicable federal privileges. The Parties seek to protect confidential personal information relating to Plaintiff or the putative class members, , and other records that contain personal information relating to Plaintiff or the putative class members (e.g., Social Security numbers, home addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, drivers’ licenses, and other private identifiers). The Parties also seek to protect Defendant’s business and proprietary records that are not readily known to the public. Specifically, this action is likely to involve trade secrets related to records of website development, maintenance, operation, and improvements, internet archives, system documentation, software, engineering information, vendor information, information regarding business relationships with third parties, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Public disclosure of this confidential information could cause significant harm to both parties: for Defendant, revealing proprietary methods and technical implementations to competitors could result in competitive disadvantage; for Plaintiff and putative class members, disclosure of sensitive personal information could result in privacy violations and potential identity theft risks. Both Parties have legitimate interests in ensuring such information remains confidential during litigation. 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL." 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an Expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which 2.10 Party or Parties: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained Experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as "CONFIDENTIAL." 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify — so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other Parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed "CONFIDENTIAL." After the inspecting Party has identified the material it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the "CONFIDENTIAL" legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding all protected testimony, unless otherwise stipulated on the record. (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend "CONFIDENTIAL." If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party's confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner. 6.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to maintain confidentiality under Eastern District Local Rules 230 and 251 (and in compliance with Eastern District Local Rules 141 and 141.1, if applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the Parties agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived described above, all Parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Designating Party's designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "CONFIDENTIAL" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A); (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the Court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Order. (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL," that Party must: (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the Party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Order; and (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or order shall not produce any information designated in this action as subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party's permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court or arbitration of its Confidential material — and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 9. A NON-PARTY'S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non- Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-Party's Confidential Information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party's Confidential Information, then the Party shall: (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party; (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information requested; and (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party. (c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this Court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party's Confidential Information responsive to the shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the Court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the Parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the Parties may incorporate their agreement in the Order submitted to the court. 12. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Order. 12.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 141. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 141, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 141 is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 13. FINAL DISPOSITION Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, Expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and Expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). Dated: April 7, 2025 KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP By: /s/ Nathan D. Chapman Nathan D. Chapman Jonathan D. Marvisi
Attorneys for Defendant Hyatt Corporation
WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, PLC
By: __/s/ Lauren Lendzion_ Thiago M. Coelho Lauren Lendzion Jennifer M. Leinbach Jesenia A. Martinez Jesse S. Chen N. Nima Shamtoub Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
I hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing. I have obtained authorization to affix their signatures to this document. By: /s/ Nathan D. Chapman Nathan D. Chapman
________________________ [print or type full name], of __________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”) that was issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on [date] in the case of Jimenez v. Hyatt Corporation, LLC; Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK. I agree that I will be bound by the provisions of the Order with respect to any Confidential Information provided to me under the terms thereof. I agree that if I receive any Confidential Information, I will not make any copies thereof nor disclose such Confidential Information except as permitted by the Order. I will maintain all such Confidential Information in a secure manner to prevent unauthorized access to it. Upon request of Counsel after the conclusion of this action, I will return the Confidential Information, including copies, notes or other transcriptions made therefrom, to the Counsel who provided me with the Confidential Information. I further understand that if I fail to comply with the Order, I may be subject to sanctions by the Court. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of ___________________________[print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Order. Date: ____________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: ___________________________ Printed name: ____________________________ Signature: ________________________________