Jimenez v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jimenez v. Fischer

108 A.D.3d 958, 968 N.Y.S.2d 809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 18, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 108 A.D.3d 958 (Jimenez v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jimenez v. Fischer, 108 A.D.3d 958, 968 N.Y.S.2d 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. As such, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Samuels v Fischer, 98 AD3d 760, 760 [2012]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. As such, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Samuels v Fischer, 98 AD3d 760, 760 [2012]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.3d 958, 968 N.Y.S.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack