Jimenez v. City of Phoenix
This text of 35 F. App'x 666 (Jimenez v. City of Phoenix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marco Antonio' Jimenez appeals the district court’s order striking the “First Amended Complaint” he submitted seven months after entry of judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, see Maljack Prods., Inc. v. GoodTimes Home Video Corp., 81 F.3d 881, 888 (9th Cir.1996), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed August 1, 2001.
[667]*667Jimenez’s remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-v-city-of-phoenix-ca9-2002.