Jimenez v. City of New York

290 A.D.2d 321, 736 N.Y.S.2d 219, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 431
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jimenez v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 A.D.3d 107

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered October 25, 2000, which granted defendant City’s motion insofar as to extend its time to comply with the same court’s December 9, 1999 conditional discovery order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of the reasonable excuse provided by defendant City for failing timely to comply with court-ordered discovery, the strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes on their merits, the lack of prejudice to plaintiff, and the absence of any willful or contumacious conduct on the City’s part, the motion court properly exercised its discretion by extending the City’s time for compliance (see, Green v Mohamed, 275 AD2d 599). Concur — Williams, J.P., Tom, Rosenberger, Wallach and Mar-low, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimenez v. City of New York, 290 A.D.2d 321, 736 N.Y.S.2d 219, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

290 A.D.2d 321 (Jimenez v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Mohamed
275 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)